Burnout has two fixes. Most teams only try one.

Look up burnout and you'll find lots of potential solutions. Workshops on resilience. Blogs on morning routines. Apps that walk you through breathing exercises before your first meeting. Most of it is genuinely useful. But it only addresses part of the problem.

Ronald Heifetz's adaptive leadership framework describes two types of problems (Heifetz, 1994). A technical problem has a known fix. You get the right expertise and you can solve the problem. An adaptive challenge is different. There's no clear solution and it isn't even clear what the problem is. The group needs to work together to diagnose the problem and then address it together. 

Burnout gets treated almost entirely as technical. Sleep better. Take your PTO. Learn to meditate. All of that helps, but none of it can really figure out what in the system is producing the exhaustion to begin with.

A leader I coached, I'll call him Marcus, really struggled a couple years ago. He was a senior leader at a mid-sized nonprofit, managing a team and what felt like an ever increasing workload. By the fall he was completely burned out. His organization did what a good organization should do. They told him to take the time he needed. He used his PTO, stepped away for three weeks, and came back rested. Within two months, he was struggling again.

Nothing about his job had changed. He still had no clarity on which of his competing priorities mattered most. He still had a manager who canceled their one-on-ones more often than she kept them. He still worked in a culture where flagging a problem got treated as complaining, so he stopped raising concerns. The time off helped him personally. But it didn't address the conditions that had worn him down.

Research backs up why. Gallup found that how people experience their workload predicts burnout more strongly than how many hours they work, and that the real causes are unfair treatment, an unmanageable workload, unclear roles, and a lack of support from a manager (Robinson, 2023). Each one of those is a condition of the system, not a characteristic of the person experiencing burnout. Gallup's data also points to the manager as a key factor. A good manager clarifies priorities, promotes fairness, and makes support available before someone burns out. When there's burnout on a team, usually a manager is part of the problem.

Christina Maslach's research explores what burnout does to a person once those conditions have been in place long enough. She found it shows up in three ways: exhaustion, cynicism toward the work, and a shrinking sense that your effort actually accomplishes anything (Maslach, 1982). Her research is clear that burnout is an organizational problem before it is a personal one. Time away can ease the exhaustion for a while. But it doesn’t affect the workload, the unclear expectations, or the manager that was a factor in creating it, and none of those get fixed by one person resting more.

When a flood hits a neighborhood, you evacuate people first. That part isn't in question, and no one should feel guilty for needing it. But if you send everyone home once the water recedes and never touch the levee, you haven't solved anything. Time off is the evacuation. It's the technical fix, and it's necessary. The levee is the adaptive work, and it only gets built when the people closest to the problem sit down together and work out what's actually causing the flooding, and what they're each going to do differently because of it.

None of this means the personal side doesn't matter. People do need real rest and they don't need to work from the beach. But if you're a leader watching your team go through exhaustion, recovery, and exhaustion again, that's data. It's telling you that someone still needs to deal with the levee, and that work can't be done by the exhausted person alone.

Want these insights sent straight to your inbox? Sign up for the newsletter below!