The one question that turned a hard no into a yes.
Years ago, I coached someone who kept hitting a wall with her supervisor. Every budget conversation went the same way. She would make her case for more staff. He would say no, or "not now," and the conversation would end there. She started to assume he didn’t value her work.
Instead of making her case a third time, she tried something different. She asked him: "Can you help me understand what is making this a hard yes for you?"
He then shared that it wasn’t about the value of her work. He was worried about precedent. If he approved her request, other directors would be in his office by the end of the week asking for the same thing.
By asking that question, she changed the negotiation. She was no longer arguing against a no. She was solving a real problem: how to get the resources she needed without creating something that would have impacts on the other teams. They ended up structuring the request as a one-year pilot tied to specific outcomes, something he could defend to the other directors because it wasn’t a policy change. She got what she needed. He got something he could defend. Neither of those interests would have surfaced if she had kept restating her position.
Negotiation researchers Roger Fisher, William Ury, and Bruce Patton, in their book Getting to Yes, explain why that question mattered so much. A position is what someone says they want. An interest is why they want it. When two people argue their positions, they tend to get stuck because positions are often incompatible. Interests usually leave more room to work with than either side expects. The problem is that people rarely state their interests outright. Someone has to ask.
Research backs up just how much asking matters. A Harvard study, led by Karen Huang along with Michael Yeomans, Alison Wood Brooks, Julia Minson, and Francesca Gino, had pairs of strangers get to know each other over instant message. One person in each pair was told to ask at least nine questions, the other, at most four. The people who asked more questions, especially follow-up questions that showed they were tracking what the other person said, were rated as more likable by their conversation partner. The researchers pointed to responsiveness as the reason. A good follow-up question signals that you actually heard the answer and want to understand it better, not just move past it.
This works in both directions. The skill is the same whether you are negotiating with someone above you or leading a conversation with someone on your team. When you hit resistance, the instinct is to restate your case with more evidence. A better choice is to ask what is underneath the resistance. What is this person protecting? What would need to be true for them to feel safe saying yes?
Asking isn’t the same as agreeing, and it’s not a negotiating trick. It’s how you find out what the other person actually needs, so you can look for the overlap between that and what you need. That’s how you create something valuable together.
Want these insights sent straight to your inbox? Sign up for the newsletter below!
